Which is faster

English-speaking forum for talkers =)
Ответить
Аватара пользователя
l2ulinux
Сообщения: 9
Зарегистрирован: 17 май 2012, 01:15
Откуда: Florida, USA

Which is faster

Сообщение l2ulinux » 17 май 2012, 08:53

I want to know which would be faster to use. If you loaded the iso. to a USB flash drive are burned it to a DVD.
I want to use the Orosa release to work with but not to install it. I use about 7 computers around the Home are
Shop. If I just use it Live and save my work to a USB drive then I could use it that way with all the computers.

Аватара пользователя
ДроноваЮ
Сообщения: 2636
Зарегистрирован: 01 июн 2011, 13:11
Operating system: Ubuntu/ROSA
Откуда: Москва

Re: Which is faster

Сообщение ДроноваЮ » 17 май 2012, 14:30

As I understand, we should compare some 'seek time' benchmarks, and as I know, FAT on live-usb will be far more faster than ISO on DVDs. Didn't google for exact data, though.

PastorDi
Сообщения: 2743
Зарегистрирован: 25 авг 2011, 12:34
Operating system: IBM DOS, OS/2
Откуда: Санкт-Петербург
Контактная информация:

Re: Which is faster

Сообщение PastorDi » 18 май 2012, 14:28

Use USB Flash is much faster than DVD. You can use a flash and save your data on it. But in order to store all the data on this flash, you need to burn the ISO image Unetbootin. Do not use the "dd".

Аватара пользователя
l2ulinux
Сообщения: 9
Зарегистрирован: 17 май 2012, 01:15
Откуда: Florida, USA

Re: Which is faster

Сообщение l2ulinux » 21 май 2012, 05:34

Thanks for the replies back. What wanted to do was install ROSA the fastest way.
I had tried with it on DVD and it would freeze-up everytime.

Ответить

Вернуться в «Off the wall»